What does being "Eurosceptics" in Italy? At first a lot. It was viewed with an eye of compassion, commiseration. Your partner will look a bit like an alien, or an odd specimen from the human for some reason the nineteenth directly. Those were the times from € dell'ubriacatura, the media had just coined the neologism curious eurozone, it was not even a playground. These were the years of the Olive World of Clinton, of Blair, of Schroeder, the Jospin. But most of the first two. In short we are talking about that historical period in which they laid the foundations of globalization. Not surprisingly, then, most or all spoke well of open markets, and therefore of globalization. As most of you know, today, this term is almost a dirty word. He acquired a negative connotation and of course incredibly, as often happens, things that were once considered a panacea for all ills today are designed to cause all our problems. Well
would be too easy to see how the euro and ultimately the European Union itself have been built up in function and in view of globalization. And 'no doubt that Italians Europe is very expensive in terms of political autonomy, economic and monetary union. We individuals, then, is fully downloaded the burden of having to adopt a single currency which has in fact halved the purchasing power of each. Of course, the cost of money has gone down. The euro (in fact, Germany) was a major umbrella against winds that could have been cut down speculation on the currency of a country in debt like Italy (chronically, we might say). But you can not forget how important it is to use the monetary lever in the development of an economy. There is reminding him once more to China: short of breath when America accused the devaluation of the yuan , the good mates with almond eyes respond with an Oriental, courteous vaffancin.
In other term, probably, the euro is not functional at all EU countries but only to Germany, which has replaced the brand with the new currency (without getting bogged down very far, since both hard currency) but in return got the command of a 'Europe less and less significant on the international stage and more and more subservient to the policy of German expansion. Europe, let us say frankly, as long as there is, and will depend on Germany. We live in a sort of pax germanorum . Just think of the fact that the Germans have appointed EU ambassador to China as a diplomat them (all this with a view to a policy of special relations with the Asian giant.) eurobond O to each other. Or the impasse by giving aid partners in crisis. Continual references to Germany's internal affairs (see Finance) of other countries. Nobody is in any doubt as to note the German economy is the only in Europe to be significantly increased in a terrible 2010 for (almost) everyone, including the United States?
But we look to Italy.
that no political party has declared a "Eurosceptic" is partially true. In fact, if there was someone in Italy had to say against the current vulgate Europeanist was just the League, especially in the direction of interventionism and excessive weight of unelected institutions like the European Commission and the central bank.
The rest was caused also by the very civil society that has never been against Europe. A little, perhaps, began to be a result of bloodletting called "euro" for which, grotesquely, we also paid a fee in the year 90 (the charge for Europe). In Italy we were so badly governed and there is such widespread distrust in the institutions that we are back to the old "if France or Spain provided magna. Passively accept to be ruled from Europe (see Germany) because our system is not considered credible.
The League is simply the result of the company of big eaters, the De Mita, many of Irpinia, the cathedrals in the desert, the speaker for the South, from ministries to state holdings, on rubbish bell, or statutes in Sicily.
Furthermore, perhaps after hearing someone talk about our role in Europe and the world? O what shall we do in Afghanistan? Or measures to reduce the public debt? In all this hubbub is the only league that tries to reach a just result, always the same, federalism. The other chattering, arguing, they tend to each other pitfalls.
The Chairman of the Board in Italy is Sergio Marchionne, the only one from his point of view is making reforms.
Secondly we Bossi & Tremonti. The rest is crap frankly.
However, we are at the end of a political cycle and I think I can say that something is moving. Civil society goes far beyond politics and think this is well for the future.
Finally, I specify as the undersigned is not at all opposed to federalism.
I think it is wrong not put it in an organic context of reforms (see presidentialism).
The current prime minister can not objectively do anything, not even kick a minister. And the parliament is a bloated slow in taking decisions. In a world where political power is likely to be defrauded by the financial strength of its role not do this slowness can no longer afford. In fact do
federalism in the current context can actually be a risk.
0 comments:
Post a Comment