Neopuritanesimo and patriotism. The new face of the Italian left. Two considerations partenza.Un politician must be able to perform his duties with dignity and honor
. Second,
patriotism should be a value at which its action inspired by a citizen, and even more representative of the people.
What is patriotism? Just the feeling of devotion, love and allegiance to their homeland. A noble value, therefore, easily distinguishable from nationalism
(ie the ideological tendency to exalt the concept of nation exaggerates the common feeling of attachment to his country). In other words, nationalism can be understood as Deger
of patriotism. At this point I would write something about the story of constitutional patriotism, recently revived by some members of the so-called right, fascists until about fifteen years ago and now engaged in giving lessons to all liberal. Evidently be converted on the Damascus often coincides with the need to make some real abjurations to reassure and convince the next on the sincerity of his repentance. It was therefore felt the need to propagate some of these concepts did not feel absolutely need, like that of "constitutional patriotism."
According to them we should be patriotic, not because we love our country but because we love the Constitution. No more love, devotion, loyalty to their homeland, Italy, but love, devotion, fidelity to the law. The constitutional patriotism is, in their view, a watered down version and acceptable consequence of patriotism pure and simple. In fact, patriotism can be such only in its original sense. Talk about a "variant" is constitutional because it is completely absurd defined a concept of total devotion to a positive law, written by men and therefore perfectible, subject to change. But also because fidelity, ' attachment, the love of a rule (legal or moral) is typical of absolute states, primarily those where the rule of the theocracy (but not only). Constitutional patriotism is a re-reading the end, despite all good intentions, of what in some countries is considered the loyalty, love, devotion to religious law. The Constitution almost loses its characteristic as a rule written by men to assume a character of sacredness, objectivity, absoluteness, that did not fit in a positive rule. It 's a trend that may well see in politics today, when we tend to "sanctify" our basic law.
In other words, in my opinion, the constitutional patriotism is a wives' tale.
In countries like U.S., Britain, France, Germany, patriotism is not even constitutional. We are proud to be American, British, French, German, without having to justify difficult balancing acts. We are proud to be who you are regardless of own constitution, as aware of their history, culture, language and identity. Based on this property (that can be infinitely more representative of a people rather than a law), or read themselves, you can understand their place in the world. And 'the people that determines the law, not the law that determines the people.
Without this premise due, I come quickly to the point that I wanted to deal with: that the chromosomal changes that the left seems to suffer in recent months. This is a process of genuine, real, or a mere reaction (opportunistic) linked to the political contingencies?
This question could respond by saying that, traditionally, the Italian left has never been particularly patriotic. Except as socialist Sandro Pertini some personality and some moments Craxi, all those who came from the ranks of the PCI have never been interested in food patriotism or love for the special flag. Everything was unceremoniously dismissed as feelings typically due to the two decades. Even today, the word patriotism / country is regarded with suspicion and brought back to the political / ideological precise.
Something similar can be done to the Democrat side, not interested in betting on these issues. From this point of view there was a rematch of the Church on the Risorgimento.
Catholics and Marxists (of strong 3 / 4 of the electorate) have worked diligently to forget the Italians of the concepts that were exploited by the fascist rhetoric but who were at the base of the Risorgimento and the Unification of Italy.
All this has done nothing but prepare the ground, along with 40 years of misrule of party politics, the phenomenon that the League has as its ultimate goal the secession.
The objective of the Northern League is in fact to get the federal rule and then plant more or less stable in the northern macro-region, acting as a force Government and opposition inside and outside (in relations with Rome). Which, moreover, has always been able to do.
Depending antileghista, therefore, the left becomes even patriotic. We saw Benigni in Sanremo (or have seen), or Saviano with the tricolor. Even the truculent blogger Piero Ricca is served the Italian flag to reiterate his opposition to the League's phenomenon. I think there is a reevaluation of the meaning of unity that is inherent in the flag, the hymn, in our often tragic history. A re-evaluation of the experience Risorgimento and the importance of this third "anniversary" Italian.
All very nice and admirable but with a strong flavor instrumental.
Also because on the one hand we talk about it with the tricolor on the other league.
As regards the neopuritanesimo then, the story is even more mortifying.
We have gone from "anything goes" to the "all sober." Sexual freedom, a libertine spirit, has always been characteristic of the left since '68 (well before even some areas of the right to tell the truth). The PCI was severe as or perhaps more of the same DC and the Catholic church regarding moral (sexual), but over the years subsequent to May 68 were the watchwords of others. The opposition in four
quatt'otto and wore the habit of Savonarola and did their theses Church regarding sexual morality. More
that these "slippages" would prefer a programmatic platform, credible alternative government. A leader in opposition to Berlusconi. And do not hope for support "intrnazionali" far from disinterested to get rid of the current government.
opposition that wants to claim the government of Italy should not act as a bank for international press campaign. The dignity of their country is defended even when there is a premier unworthy. Indeed, even more so.